-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Thomas Larsen wrote:
Hi,
This is an interesting idea indeed. However, I'm not sure it would fly, for two reasons:
- I doubt many receivers (of journals, etc.) would be able to
understand them well enough. Academic papers aren't always easy to understand, especially for a non-expert, and they could be, God forbid, _misunderstood_. 2) Service providers would, I think, be unwilling to catch on to this idea, given the low image of Wikipedia in many areas of academia.
Thoughts?
—Thomas Larsen
1) My personal experience would disagree. I am far from expert on Japanese poetry - I know not a lick of Japanese, and at best I have a good background understanding - yet I was able to quite profitably employ a number of papers I found in JSTOR in articles like [[Shotetsu]] or [[Fujiwara no Teika]]. Academic papers in technical subjects certainly can be difficult, and I've read any number of math or computer science papers which are utterly useless to laymen. But let's beware generalizing that to all papers. 2) That could be an argument for this proposal. 'Perhaps we haven't been as rigorous and high-quality as you'd like - but we're willing to improve, if you'll help us.'
- -- gwern