On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:15:03 -0500, "Wily D" wilydoppelganger@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure that anyone's suggesting abuse is *routine*. I will suggest it's most likely "fairly" to "quite" scarce, although I cannot verify this myself. All that you or I know is that it can and has happened, and almost certainly will in the future at some point or another. Reviewing the list I don't see any indication that anyone believes it's "routine". Did I miss something?
I must be missing something. Why are we even having this discussion if there is no evidence of present abuse, and no contention of likely abuse outside of the normal range of human fallibility?
Guy (JzG)