Interesting. Just to be disruptive, I proposed OBT for Talk:Obama: People WP:DONTLIKEIT was the only concept I got from scanning the responses. The only point I remember; one user mentioned his watchlist; missing the point that he could just simply add particular topic talk subpages to his watchlist. I didn't mention there for various reasons.
-Sv
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Jay Litwyn brewhaha@edmc.net wrote:
Organizing [[talk_prion]] was the first thing I did where no rules apply. All I did was entitle threads and answer what I could. When you are scanning for changes, headings help you identify the end of a thread. Once you hav entitled the threads, you can see which threads are actually members of the same thread. I did not get to that. _______ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Brewhaha@edmc.net
"stevertigo" stvrtg@gmail.com wrote in message news:7c402e010903121840o2a719b7cua27e899aacddfcd9@mail.gmail.com...
Certain thready discussions on certain contentious talk pages would benefit from less disorganized (ie. standard format) talk pages, and more topical-based ones. I wrote up a basic concept at WP:TP (direct shortcut WP:OBT ):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Talk_page#Organization_by_topic
仇恨郵件 最值得歡迎的
-SV
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l