-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Jimmy Wales wrote: | Erik Moeller wrote: | |>For reasons unknown to me, the arbitration committee currently only |>accepts cases directly referred to it by you. This should be changed |>ASAP. | | | The reason is that they were still in the process of working out | internal procedures when I pressured them to get going on some real | cases. I did that because some sysops were starting to feel a need to | be more aggressive than our traditions would support out of a growing | sense that we were in a state of anarchy where trolls were getting | ever more bold. | | The arbitration committee agreed to handle some emergency cases, but | prefers to go slowly in figuring out all their procedures otherwise.
Would you consider referring the 168 issue as such a case? As one who was online during last night's "undelete war" I am probably biased, but it seems to me that 168 broke a fair number of separate rules for sysops.
Nathan aka pakaran