On 1/22/06, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/23/06, Jay Converse supermo0@gmail.com wrote:
How can anyone be selected for discreetness on Wikipedia when
essentially
every action you take can be looked at later?
There are other situations where discreetness may be called for. Direct emails for example.
That's true... I'm still kinda going down the line of thought that you can't be selected for discreetness. Unless every single person who votes for someone at RfA has had to make some confidential dealings, how can that be the basis upon which they were made an admin?
-- I'm not stupid, just selectively ignorant.