On 4/10/06, Steve Bennett stevage@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/10/06, maru dubshinki marudubshinki@gmail.com wrote:
It might be. A good implementation of this would be sort of like a form letter with slots, or like the image upload's page method of picking licenses- instead of requiring one to know what they need, provide a list. That way, we don't get 1000 articles a day, all bearing {{stub}} or {{uncategorized}}...
Well, at the moment we get however many, without either {stub} *or* {uncategorized*. :)
I can't immediately see how to do that with categories or stubs, but probably someone smart can. Stubs are more promising because they're directly hierarchical...categories are..erm...
Steve
Well, I figure that in practice one would restrict the list to less than 50- that should cover most major stub categories. If the stub-sorting project people want to sharpen them further, well, more power to them. As for categories, oy. That could be a problem. Ideally, one could have a mini little search engine with a feature like Google's misspelling feature ("People who search for the Hitler category also searched for the Genocidal Dictator category. Would you like to search for Genocidal Dictator?"), but while we're dreaming, we might as well ask for an answer to AOL IPs or Wikipedia 1.0
~maru