2008/12/17 Wily D wilydoppelganger@gmail.com:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
2008/12/16 David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com:
2008/12/16 Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com:
Sounds like a fantastic idea. Only problem seems to be that they publish the wikipedia articles/summaries before the papers, it needs to be the other way around so the paper can be a reference for the summary.
- '''d''', nn, v, auto, spam - ~~~~
Are you serious?
That would be the outcome at AfD, assuming it got there, which would depend on how trigger happy the C:CSD patrollers that day are.
It's discussed in a peer reviewed journal, that covers verifiability. I don't see how it's autobiographical, it's about science, not a person. It's not commercial, so it's not spam. I'm not sure what the notability guidelines are for science, so I guess it might fail there, I'd have to look it up.