Daniel R. Tobias wrote:
On 3 Apr 2007 at 08:17, "David Gerard" dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
You're slipping into something resembling Copyright Paranoia For Convenience.
"It's a copyright violation *and* it's original research. Probably violates a patent too, if I looked closely enough."
And a trademark.
The various manufacturers certainly own the trademarks for their respective products. I'm surprised that Guy is not arguing for trademark violation.
Ec