On 5/14/07, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
You appear to have gone off into entirely unconvincing sidelines of querulousness here. Is this still supposed to be a deletion reason?
My position is that it is imposble to write the article in a NPOV manner useing existing sources. I have identified a POV statement which it is unlikely that any existing sources counter. It is the logical end point of that aproach
Now there are three ways out of this. Delete the article. Shift over the a less exacting standard of NPOV for stubs and then apply that standard to deletion modify (we alreadly do the former). Remove "imposible to write a NPOV article" as a deletion reason which isnt going to happen.