On 23/05/07, Joe Szilagyi szilagyi@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/23/07, Fred Bauder fredbaud@waterwiki.info wrote:
You get review though dispute resolution ending in arbitration.
You are saying ArbCom will be taking on cases to decide if an article violates BLP?
Note that in almost all cases (and there are a lot), BLP problems are resolved with invocation of "Don't be stupid" and a good understanding of BLP amongst admins - that is, that no article at all beats a dubious one, and - and this is a point a lot of the people in the Crystal whozis debate don't grasp - that Wikipedia doesn't have to be finished tomorrow, that we're not working to a deadline, that writing an encyclopedia article is not investigative journalism and that having *no article at all* on someone is not a gaping hole in the encyclopedia and it can *wait*.
- d.