On 12/10/05, David Gerard fun@thingy.apana.org.au wrote:
MacGyverMagic/Mgm wrote:
That is clearly against policy and such people should simply be ignored. Articles can only be deleted if they were substantially similar to deleted work. Perhaps it would help if we were to require specification of whether someone was voting based on the article subject or the article state?
Ignoring policy is already de rigeur on AFD. Compare voting and nomination patterns on AFD to [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy]]. The actual policy on AFD is "Because we feel like it." This is another reason to nuke from orbit and see if the cockroaches can do deletion better.
- d.
Examples?