On 3/30/06, Geoffrey Burling llywrch@agora.rdrop.com wrote:
Thanks. It's clearly something for our ambassadors to say when a jourmalist repeats the claim that Wikipedia has this collection of pr0n beneath the surface. Say, along the lines of "I'm not aware of that allegation, & while I doubt its accuracy anyone concerned can easily filter out objectionable material by looking at the article's category."
Filtering on category is a very broad brush. You would end up wiping out straight forward sexual education material with no objectional images, in the same blow as porn or sex positions or whatever. Content tagging the pages or images themselves would work a lot better.
Steve