On 14/10/2007, Thatcher131 Wikipedia thatcher131@gmail.com wrote:
Why not have cases heard before a panel of 5 Arbitrators, randomly chosen from the list of Arbitrators active when the case was accepted? Cases that are voted out 5-0 or 4-1 would close as is; cases where the votes were 3-2 or less would be heard before the entire committee. That way, Arbitrators do not have to hear every case, and might not burn out as quickly. (A vote of 5-0 is all most cases get by the Fall of the year anyway.)
Thatcher
Been suggested but check out the size of last years candidate pool for the problem.