It's not my assertion that they should not be, but simple fact that they aren't, never have been. NOT and RS. NOTE and BLP. This is a philosophy as old as the pedia. If you weren't aware of this, now you know. If you just don't accept it, this is nothing more then you trolling now.
On 9/10/07, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
Brock Weller wrote:
I'll give you a definition, information presented with little or no context that does not contribute to the encyclopedia value of the article. Policies are not and have never been subject to neutral point of view, so your attempt to limit my answer seems disingenuous, apologies if you did not mean it so.
Your suggestion that policies should not be subject to the neutral point of view is bound to produce paradoxical results. It is difficult to have an intimate understanding of how NPOV applies to articles unless we are willing to apply it to our own behaviour.
Ec
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l