2009/5/6 Carcharoth carcharothwp@googlemail.com:
On reflection, there is lots of vandalism to that talk page, and it doesn't match Liddle's description of what he claims to have added. i.e. Unless he gives more details, he is almost certainly having us on here. But doing so in a magazine article like that without providing a link that would demonstrate the truth of what he is saying just shows how little he understands how a wiki works.
Well I went through the [[Rob Liddle]] to see If I could find him defending himself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rod_Liddle&diff=104862199&...
Perhaps but nothing of significance on the Cristiano Ronaldo article around that date.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rod_Liddle&diff=prev&oldid...
Again possible but nothing of significance on the Cristiano Ronaldo article around that date
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rod_Liddle&diff=prev&oldid...
Loads of vandalism on Cristiano Ronaldo around that date but nothing that fits Liddle's claims.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/81.156.42.14
Is another candidate but again nothing