I assume that RK is referring to the edit war over [[Palestinian views of the peace process]]? (I haven't been following this thread too closely, so correct me if I'm mistaken.) Observe, then, a very convenient memory lapse on his part. Robert wrote:
People are not offering sources or facts; they are just using their personal opinions, and anger at Israel, to remove verified and important historical facts.
Observe one instance where someone (me) did offer sourced and referenced historical facts (regarding the Treaty of Hudaibiya) that contradicted part of the article in question. Note that my reference was to a Wikipedia article, so RK could have checked it with one mouse click:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Talk:Palestinian_views_of_the_pea...
And observe RK's response; he responded to some of my objections, but left others (those that were sourced and referenced to a reliable source) untouched; he responded to Martin's objections on the same topic with more editorializing, instead of the sources and facts that he claims to love so much:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Talk:Palestinian_views_of_the_pea... http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Talk:Palestinian_views_of_the_pea...
But despite his lack of sourced, referenced factual information to counter my objections, he reverted the article, twice, so it included the material that I had challenged and he had not justified (and somehow, he removed the NPOV and inclusion dispute headers, but never mind -- that could have been an accident.)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Palestinian_views_of_the_peace_pr... http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Palestinian_views_of_the_peace_pr...
(I added further references to reliable historical sources later on, if anyone has any doubts: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Talk:Palestinian_views_of_the_pea... )
RK continues to claim that he is trying to build an accurate, NPOV article on this topic, but his actions suggest otherwise.
--Charles P. (en:User:Mirv)