On 13/05/07, Charlotte Webb charlottethewebb@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/13/07, Andrew Gray shimgray@gmail.com wrote:
do we class those recipients as "notable" in the same way as someone who won it by more stringent standards a century later?
Seriously, who cares?
*shrug*. I'm not saying it's important, or that we should do anything about it - it's just an anomaly in the way we determine "notability" that struck me as interesting. It never hurts to know the quirks of a system...