Peter Mackay wrote:
Which leads me to ponder about how vulnerable WP is to similar frivolononsense. We do the best we can and someone sues us because their face is in the "body art" article or something.
My ideal future is that WP has such a high reputation among jurists that the judge dismisses the case and jails the plaintiff's lawyer for having the temerity to cast aspersions on the judge's favorite online reference.
We could get to that state sooner by just adding hagiographic biographies of all the judges that might hear our case - we can see from de:'s case what could happen if we don't.
:-) :-)
Stan