On 11/28/06, charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com wrote:
I noticed this too. But I tend to assume that these messages are like health warnings on cigarette packets: they become more extreme, because the moderate versions are ignored by the people they are really aimed at.
We may need to audit deletions. I'm becoming uneasy about the quick paths. But a great deal of discretionary deletion does need to happen.
Charles
What about were a systematic effort to remove sources is underway? As in this article
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Frank_Coe&diff=next&oldid=...
same occurred again
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Frank_Coe&diff=39262981&ol...
Charles added the needs sources Template months later
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Frank_Coe&diff=next&oldid=...
Does anyone look at the histories before nominating for deletion? I could cite a couple of dozen similiar examples.
Nobs01