On 17/10/2007, Will Beback will.beback.1@gmail.com wrote:
David Gerard wrote:
On 17/10/2007, Will Beback will.beback.1@gmail.com wrote:
don't see any comment from you about links outside of article space, so I'm not sure if you are in favor removing those. On the whole, it does appear that you are saying to Wikipedia editors that they must deal with harassment either by growing a thicker skin or by leaving the project. Is that correct?
Not all, but certainly those whose skin is so very sensitive that they insist that removing michaelmoore.com from [[Michael Moore]] as an "attack site" is a necessary move. You keep trying to reduce this to binary choices. Doing so has already led to blithering idiocy (e.g. on your part with removing the Making Light links). Perhaps you need to stop trying to reduce it to binary choices.
Let's not engage in uncivil language with each other while we're discussing harassment.
The move to remove all links to nielsenhayden.com was a blitheringly idiotic one.
You have apologised, but you show no sign of understanding *why your action was wrong*.
Prove me wrong on that statement. Please state your understanding of why your action was wrong.
- d.