And war to control the content of the "NPOV" article is not a disastrous idea?
Fred Bauder
No, it's a disastrous idea; it's inherently antithetic to NPOV. What you'd be doing is creating articles that are deliberately non NPOV.
Content FORKS are never, ever desirable.
On 27/06/2010, Fred Bauder fredbaud@fairpoint.net wrote:
Yes, articles from diverse points of view would be good.
Fred Bauder
I have come across topics that are approached differently by different groups and thought that parallel articles might be appropriate in those cases. I'd like a wider view on the topic. Here is where I've discussed it on talk pages:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Judaism#Jewish_Versi... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:David#King_David_in_Judaism
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
-- -Ian Woollard