geni wrote:
Do you blame them? People have seen the amount of damage admins can do before being stopped. They know that if the admin is smart enough and not unlucky it is highly unlikely they will be stopped.
So what is the rational response to this situation. To elect safe admins who you have a fairly good idea how they will act. That means electing admins who respect policy and don't like getting into fights.
Because I really don't know and am curious, can you give an example to illustrate the amount of damage an admin can do?
-Rich