--- Daniel Ehrenberg littledanehren@yahoo.com wrote:
--- Graham Burnett grahamburnett@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
Reasons for enforcing ban:
In spite of repeated warning, persists in his
annoying habit to make
dozens of edits per page within an interval of
seconds,
Banning somebody for making too many edits to
one
article in too short a
space of time is pretty draconian. I don't think
it's even close to a a
good reason for banning.
Well I guess I'd have to be banned too 'cos I'm frequently guilty of this as well.
Graham (quercus robur)
I used to make many multiple edits to an article, but as soon as it was pointed out that this was bad (with lir), I've tried to avoid it. -LDan
At some point, I heard so much how bad it was, I tried to fit all my changes in only one edit. I lost my work several times when some timeouts occured.
Perhaps my doing all my edits in one row can make up for those requiring plenty of savings ???
For sure, this cannot be a reason for banning. It is annoying perhaps. But not *hurting* anyone, nor *damaging* the project. Are they any other reasons for rejecting people ?
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com