On Sat, 27 Jan 2007, Eugene van der Pijll wrote:
How does that reduce the scope of the policy?
Because it says there is only a problem if the material is doubtful. An unsourced statement that is not challenged and not likely to be challenged -- and that is not libelous if untrue, I should add -- is not to be removed, according to WP:V.
Oh, I wish.
This still is subject to people who go around challenging random articles, which I think is an abuse of the process. It really ought to say "sincerely challenged", but it doesn't...