On 25/02/2008, WJhonson@aol.com WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
Yes the transparency part. But it's not *unclear* exactly. BC has refused to allow transparency into the code of his bot. We cannot determine what the bot exactly is using as its rules of conduct. So we cannot satisfactorily determine that it is actually in accord with the community consensus.
You have every damn edit it makes. Surely you can work out something from that.
Your total "evidence" so far is "a lot of people are upset their pictures might be deleted for not following policy as written." If that's the "community" opinion, then "the community" is *just plain wrong*. I'd suggest it isn't "the community", but rather people who don't understand and/or don't want to understand WP:NONFREE and why it's there (as you showed earlier in this thread).
- d.