--- Gregory Maxwell gmaxwell@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/15/05, Rick giantsrick13@yahoo.com wrote:
I don't think I have *ever* witnessed an admin protect a page to revistion that person did not favour. So it
can't be
*totally* random. :) I'd say that the custom is to protect to a
the
version that gets most votes, if the number of votes one casts is proportional to how much social influence one has. But it is a bad custom. Besides, now you have also received a written *request* to change to the majority opinions version. SlimVirgin also said that she would "allow" other persons than Eyeon to edit the page.
What an utterly OUTRAGEOUS comment! Who the HELL
do
you think you are? To make such a vicious attack
on
the good names of each and every single admin?! I
am
appalled, and I, personally, demand an apology!
What completely random outrage. I don't see anything claimed about that anyone should be offended about. I am appalled, and I, personally, demand emails to the list that actually make sense!
Of course, you cut off the part that I was p*ssed off about, intentionally, I'm sure.
RickK
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com