On 5/15/07, Steve Bennett stevagewp@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/15/07, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
Currently [[Invincible Snowfields]] is trying to get around this by very careful wording that contains no opinion whatsoever (and gets close to succeeding)
Was this a compliment?
but since NPOV demands that you do include opinion this is not a
valid get out either.
It does? What opinions are required at [[Tusk shell]] that aren't present?
Haven't a clue and because it only has a single source we have no way of finding out. However other sources will exist so we have a fair chance of doing so
When we only have one source indepent of the subject there is no reason to think that the article can represent existing opinions.