On Dec 6, 2007 4:01 PM, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 11:55:41 -0800 (PST), Ken Arromdee arromdee@rahul.net wrote:
If you create anti-Giano type rules because you want anti-Sweaty-Cunt type rules, your rules need a little more fine tuning. Don't use extreme examples of something to justify going against the non-extreme examples.
Anti-Giano rules? Which rules do we have that were designed to inhibit Giano's article writing?
These threads are so full of straw-men they're in danger of spontaneously combusting.