On 6/16/05, Sam Korn smoddy@gmail.com wrote:
In case you hadn't realised, debate had begun (ha!) to centre on the page protection, rather than the issue at hand. Perhaps a bit of discussion might ensue now? If it doesn't, then protection can be reapplied. I just don't like debating the veracity of a page's protection, rather than the page itself.
No, Sam, the debate on the talk page about protection, and on this list, was entirely Eyeon-centered. This is all Eyeon-controlled, please see that. It's almost a case study in trolling.
Sarah