I have a better idea. You could take the legitimate criticisms of admins that they have, and work on them.
And when someone complains about wikipedia, legitimate or otherwise (but especially legitimate), you could work on trying to resolve the problem rather than spamming them with links to wikipediareview.
I saw this all the time watching the IRC channel back in January and February. Every time someone came in, the channel would light up with 4-5 admins (usually the same ones) spamming them to "oh just go to wikipediareview."
If it's populated with nincompoops, it's wikipedia's own nincompoops who sent them there. And yes, wikipediareview DOES have legitimate posters and legitimate calls for reform.
But then again, coming from someone whose greatest desire is to "destroy" another website for daring to criticize you...
A. Nony Mouse
On 5/28/06, Stephen Bain stephen.bain@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/28/06, Erik Moeller eloquence@gmail.com wrote:
Still, it saddens me greatly whenever a good user like Katefan0 gets trampled on, and I wish we could do more to help them.
I think it's time to destroy WR. They've had more than six months to actually do some reviewing and come up with some constructive criticisms, and have offered nothing but hatred.
-- Stephen Bain stephen.bain@gmail.com _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l