On 8/8/06, Dabljuh dabljuh@gmx.net wrote:
And in the individual articles, bill and bob get to represent their indvidual views and arguments independently. The advantage being, that each view is given the opportunity to make a coherent argument: I can read bill's take, and I can read bob's take, and decide for myself which one of them is more credible.
That's the extremely optimistic view. In reality, all bob supporters go to the bob page, and the bill supporters go to bill's page, and both pages end up containing masses of unsupported hero worship and being useless to anyone.
There's no reason not to explain both sets of arguments on the one page. Your argument was a bit flawed in that you were contrasting "Bill thinks pie is good" (one page model) with "bill gets to present his individual views" (multiple page model). That's not a real comparison.
Steve