On 5/4/06, Anthony DiPierro wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
On 5/3/06, Gallagher Mark George m.g.gallagher@student.canberra.edu.au wrote:
G'day Steve,
On 03/05/06, Anthony DiPierro wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
As for "an article with no claim to notability", I actually have no idea what that phrase means.
An article has to establish the notability of its subject. If it doesn't do that, it's subject to speedy deletion.
...I recite.
No, it has to *assert* the notability of its subject. When clearing up CAT:CSD I see a lot of speedy taggings where the tagger simply figured "sure, there's an assertion of notability there, but I don't think it's good enough". Wrong.
How does an article go about asserting the notability of its subject? What would be an example of an article which asserts notability but doesn't establish it?
Anthony
Isn't the very fact that an article is written about a subject an assertion of the notability of the subject?
Anthony