On 7/2/07, Slim Virgin slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/2/07, James Farrar james.farrar@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/07/07, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, it was appropriate. The MONGO case was quite clear when we voted on it, and the vote was unanimous:
"A website that engages in the practice of publishing private information concerning the identities of Wikipedia participants will be regarded as an attack site whose pages should not be linked to from Wikipedia pages under any circumstances."
OK, so we not cannot link to the New York Times, after its recent magazine article.
I wish people would stop these hyperbolic slippery slopes. The NYT has not "outed" any Wikipedia editor.
Indeed. The editors mentioned in that article deliberately revealed their identities to the NYT, and knew the information would be published.