On 8/1/07, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
Rob wrote:
On 8/1/07, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:> >
If they are sensible, then why are they on Wikipedia Review?
If I wanted to read discussion and analysis of these allegations about SlimVirgin where else would I go? There's apparently nothing on Wikipedia about it.
Why should there be anything on Wikipedia about it? Why would you expect an encyclopedia to contain discussion and analysis of the absurd allegations of trolls and stalkers?
I'm referring to talk pages. Talk pages aren't part of the encyclopedia, they're for discussion _about_ the encyclopedia. This obviously falls under that.
In what sense? Will that discussion improve the encyclopedia in some way? Can it possibly be used as the basis of some article?