Phil Sandifer wrote:
On Oct 19, 2006, at 8:40 PM, Bryan Derksen wrote:
The term "ludicrous overkill" comes to mind. I think you've got another agenda here. :)
Damn straight.
Our articles on fictional characters are cesspools of fancruft, original research, and outright idiocy. This should be a clear call to the fact that we do not have sufficient control over these articles. We need to demonstrate our lack of tolerance with a zeal previously known only to BLP.
I want to point out I am in broad agreement with Phil here, but doubt we'd get the consensus to do it. That said, there is a consensus forming along that exact opinion, that it should be done but we'd never be able to do it. Although the list of copyright violations on the list provided were very small, they might be very large in the contributor in questions edit history.