On 29/08/06, Steve Bennett stevagewp@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/29/06, Andrew Gray shimgray@gmail.com wrote:
Jellyfish wasn't on the list at all last night; the statistics are sampling (I think) one in five thousand pageviews, so it's quite likely a glitch. They've only been running for a couple of days, and I'd strongly advise against treating them as reliable until at least a fortnight in.
The sampling period is, from my observation, constantly being decreased. It was 5000, then 1000, then 500, now 333. Well, I'm guessing just looking at what numbers have turned up at different times.
You can see what I believe is the sampling period by looking at [[MediaWiki:monobook.js]]; it's currently 5000, and hasn't been lower than 3000.
However, I can't see why Irukandji jelly fish would be so high. It's not linked from anything, it's not in the news, and it's not even jellyfish season in Queensland. It could just be a statistical anomaly, or perhaps someone is deliberately messing with the stats?
I'm betting on anomaly.
That said... JonBenet Ramsay is interesting - it surged last night and with no link from the front page. Interesting to see how quickly our use (apparently) reacts to news stories. The sex-related ones - lists of porn stars etc - were consistently high and are now dropping; I wonder where they'll stabilise at.
Yes, that trend is interesting - why did they all show up so high then disappear. Was it a time of day thing? More stats required!! :)
I really hope we will end up with "last 24 hours" and "last 7 days" stats.
It looks like it's designed to work month-by-month - I'm not sure how reliable the figures would be at smaller "resolutions". Best ask Leon...