On 1/21/06, Michael Snow wikipedia@earthlink.net wrote:
The reason many people treat the current deletion process as having urgency is the same reason we get flak for stuff like the Seigenthaler article.
I don't think that is true, really I don't. Look at AfD for 20 Jan.
I notice, by the way, that we got 208 listings today, up from a measured average of 112 in the period July-to-September. I thought AfD would throttle back before it reached the 200-listings barrier, but I was wrong.
So what do we have?
A guy who thinks that an article about an atoll should be merged with another. Why is this on Afd?
An alleged copyright infringement in English where the alleged source contains only Chinese as far as I can tell. I'm closing this AfD and querying the decision to mark as a copyright infringement
This isn't a promising start. No, AfD is filling up with stuff that would be better dealt with by thought and discussion. Not shouty "delete this please because I can't make head or tail of it!" notices.