In a message dated 1/15/2009 5:56:16 PM Pacific Standard Time, tracy.poff@gmail.com writes:
My inexpert opinion is that convincing someone that they are required to pay you to use the material bearing the false copyright notice would be fraudulent intent, though I could be wrong.>>
------------------------------
Thank you for the text of that. Don't you think it's a bit odd to claim, that someone can steal the work of someone else for no payment whatsoever ? Copyright or no?
If I work, and place a claim of copyright on my work, and you just take it, I really doubt that a *credible* excuse for theft is "he was claiming copyright without a real copyright".
It's still theft of the work of someone else's effort.
It takes me a few dozen hours to scan the pages of a public domain work. I have a perfect right to expect payment for someone else to use it. That capitalism.
Will
**************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1215855013x1201028747/aol?redir=http... cemailfooterNO62)