On Aug 21, 2006, at 11:38 AM, David Gerard wrote:
On 21/08/06, Gregory Maxwell gmaxwell@gmail.com wrote:
If someone makes a practice of going around and {{fact}}ing obvious things, then they are due an RFC, and if that fails, I'd hope arbcom would be quite willing to censure them.
It has been in the past, thankfully.
And, unless this has changed, the policy on citing sources and reliable sources expressly says not to tag stuff that you don't question the accuracy of.
Did we ever revise the definition of a reliable source to something where all of our featured articles were valid, btw?
Best, Phil Sandifer sandifer@english.ufl.edu
You are standing in an open field west of a white house, with a boarded front door. There is a small mailbox here.