At the risk of being accused of blasphemy, this hagiography of Rachel Corrie has gone on long enough. Since we've had the discussion of moving the victims of 9/11 to Meta, could we do the same thing with the Rachel Corrie iconography and worship pages?
The 9/11 information has not been moved to Meta, but to sep11.wikipedia.org. Meta is not a dump for material considered off-topic elsewhere. If the images go beyond what is acceptable on Wikipedia, they should be deleted, not moved.
The problem here is one which rarely comes up on Wikipedia: "too much information". Let me construct a less emotional analogy -- if someone uploaded 100 photos of the Golden Gate bridge, to add to the respective article or a separate page, we might argue the same way as you do for the Corrie images.
My take on this is as follows: In such cases, formal criteria become more relevant. Is the page well-designed and easy to edit and navigate? Are the images in the public domain or under the FDL? We should not overdo the "fair use" thing; having a few photos of Rachel in the article may be OK, but an entire gallery goes a bit far.
Regards,
Erik