Daniel Ehrenberg wrote:
--- Ray Saintonge wrote:
That 11474 includes many people who only stay a short while. Most of the regulars should know about it.
Ec
I didn't know about it until just now. But on a side note, is there any way we could delete accounts that have been vacant for, say, a year, automatically? We really have a bloated membership count, so the media keeps using the 'wikipedians' count..
An inactive list might be better. They would keep their user names indefinitely with their rights of access intact. All they would need to do to get back on the active list is edit something. Even editing their own preferences would do. Maybe just logging in would do.
Ec