On 11/12/05, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/12/05, Brian Haws brian@bhaws.com wrote:
So your concerns are about the process and not the particular arbitrator involved?
I didn't say that. We have a tempory apointed arbcom memeber who has just failed on an RFB (ok to be fair the "we don't need more buracrats" group is large enough to make promotion extreamly tricky). They then open a trainreck of a RFC. Under these conditons giving the user checkuser is unwise.
Why?