I'd rather not name any names over an open listserv; no need to needlessly antagonize. But if you'd like to have a private conversation, I'd be glad to.
k
On 4/4/06, Ben McIlwain cydeweys@gmail.com wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Katefan0 wrote:
Cyde Weys wrote:
I feel like we're repeating the McCarthy era, only instead of Communists, this time it's pedophiles. Where exactly are these alleged pedophiles? I've heard a lot of accusations of pedophilia being thrown about (even by Jimbo, which is most unfortunate), but I haven't really seen any actual evidence of pedophilia, just people pointing at the anti-censorship types and yelling "PEDOPHILES!!" Do you have any specific evidence of pedophiles trying to co-opt Wikipedia for "mass grooming" or whatever?
I never said anybody is trying to coopt Wikipedia for mass grooming;
that
was someone else. What I said is that there are people with agendas on Wikipedia. By that I mean painting the "childlove movement" in the most flattering, least-critical light possible. And neutral editors would be most welcome to participate in the current wars on these types of
articles.
Can you point out some specific people with these agendas? Because I'm just not seeing it. And I have been getting involved (and I'm decidedly anti-pedophilia), but my thanks was an accusation of being a "pedophile troll". Gahhhrrr.
Ben McIlwain ("Cyde Weys")
~ Sub veste quisque nudus est ~ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFEMvcpvCEYTv+mBWcRAnzwAJ9vMcJYoFiRIWg3Xcr05sQYP9l5PwCfQ2Lx 3qj2vNqpNIncU5jiXO0RDs4= =gxGC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l