From: Pete/Pcb21 pete_pcb21_wpmail@pcbartlett.com steven l. rubenstein wrote:
my real purpose is to spark a frank discussion about our NPOV policy.
Yeah really?
A couple of points about your wikiquette today/yesterday:
1)Starting a vote on an issue when only side of the debate has had the opportunity to put their
- Blanket-messaging a whole bunch of talk pages about your policy proposal
(this is similar to "spamming")
- When someone comments that you have been "spamming" you delete that
comment.
- When someone restores that comment, you delete it again without
discussion when you to re-merge the duplicate pages.
- After the merging, you simply delete the page name you don't like,
without a redirect and without a deletion debate.
- You accuse another user of trying to use the other page name of
"vandalism" when it is nothing of the sort.
- When someone undeletes the page, you delete it again without any
discussion.
This is not consistent with wanting "to spark a frank discussion"
Pete
I wasn't around for the fireworks, but from what I can tell, an "anti BCE/CE" voter tried to re-write the argument of the "pro BCE/CE" side in a way that subverted the "pro" argument, and tried to unilaterally move the page to do the same thing.
Jay.