On Nov 27, 2007 10:16 PM, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
Regarding a reasonable reaction to the sockpuppeting claim, as Matthew points out "She was completely right, as far as I know, that !! was a returned user grooming an account for adminship. She was wrong in making the unsupported leap beyond that - that this meant it was a banned user grooming an account for adminship - and discounting all other possibilities."
Yes, of course. That's really what everyone said after the block, on the noticeboards even when the evidence was not known. The question is why nobody said that who actually saw the evidence. The expectation of some of us is because nobody thought it was that big a deal. This is not representative of the project in general. Again, an echo chamber.
RR