It looks to me like half her main article is negative, and there is a large negative sub-article. At first glance, that seems slightly unbalanced. However, balance isn't just a matter of having 50% good stuff and 50% bad, it's about having a distribution of good and bad that matches the distribution of good and bad information available. For example, an article on a serial killer is likely to be primarily negative, and that's completely appropriate. Should someone like this go in the same category as a serial killer? Perhaps. It's a difficult decision to make.