charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com wrote:
"The Cunctator" wrote
Huh. Just because one can't think of a reason that it would be of interest to have a list of mathematicians of Erdos Number 3 doesn't mean that noone can. Wikipedia ain't paper.
Trouble is: I have checked that my own Erdos number is at most 4. Knowing that it is exactly 4, rather than 3, is equivalent to knowing a huge amount about collaborative papers ... which is a needle-in-haystack search.
What's your H-index?