On 25 Mar 2008 at 00:03:47 UTC, "David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
Which would be you falling afoul of the fallacy that "all A is B therefore all B is A." You need to think why in this case you're wrong.
The lesson I got out of it was "If A has a bigger and more powerful clique of friends and supporters than B, then by definition A is right and B is a troll," but what do A and B equal in *your* explanation?