Delirium said:
The circumcision-related articles have tended to be a mess from both sides as well, including recruitment of activists from off-wikipedia mailing lists.
While the editing process on these articles may sometimes be somewhat fraught, I don't think there are a lot of problems with the product. Looking at "Medical analysis of circumcision", for instance, both before and after the systematic involvement of anti-anti-circumcision activists, the article doesn't seem to have suffered greatly. Looking at the earliest edits and the latest, much the same issues are dealt with and the lay reader gets a reasonable feel for the pros and cons, though minor detail differs. This doesn't seem to be a "brave white heroes fight off Jewish cultural pollution" thing at all.