From: Fred Bauder fredbaud@ctelco.net Reply-To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@Wikipedia.org To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Re: 3RR policy change Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 05:58:16 -0700
Never hurts to correct a typo while reverting, but its still a revert.
Fred
From: "JAY JG" jayjg@hotmail.com Reply-To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 07:26:32 -0500 To: wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Subject: RE: [WikiEN-l] Re: 3RR policy change
My question is, what about editors who revert while simultaneously (and deliberately) making non-trivial changes, so they can claim their edits
were
not a delete at all?
Jay.
The issue that I'm talking about is when an editor does a significant re-work of part of an article (say, re-wording or adding a number of sentences) while simultaneously reverting other parts of the article, in order to do a revert while being able to claim that they are doing substantive edits.
Jay.